sub isPrime { my (@ops) = @_; my $x = $ops[0]; if ($x < 2 || $x % 2 == 0) { return x == 2 } for (my $i = 3; $i * $i <= $x; $i += 2) { if ($x % $i == 0) { return 0 } } return 1 } sub nextPrime { my (@ops) = @_; my $x = $ops[0]; my $y = $x + 1; while (not(isPrime($y))) { $y += 1; } return $y; } sub lstprod { my (@ops) = @_; my $r = 1; for my $x (@ops) { $r *= $x; } return $r } sub totientIsPermut { my (@ops) = @_; my $n = lstprod(@ops); my $prev = 0; my $t = $n; #print "-$n, @ops\n"; for my $p (@ops) { if ($p != $prev) { $t = $t / $p; $t = ($p - 1) * $t; $prev = $p } } my @tarr = sort split('', "$t"); my @narr = sort split('', "$n"); my $ts = join('',@tarr); my $ns = join('',@narr); if ($ts eq $ns) { $rat = $n / $t; } return ($ts eq $ns) } sub update { my (@ops) = @_; my $size = @ops; for (my $x = 0; $x < $size; $x += 1) { my $next = nextPrime($ops[$x]); my @slice = @ops[($x+1).. ($size-1)]; my $nprod = $next * lstprod(@slice); if ($nprod < 10000000 && $nprod != 0) { @slice = @ops[($x) .. ($size-1)]; $slice[$x] = $next; return @slice } } @slice = @ops[1 .. ($size-1)]; return update(@slice) } my @nums = (2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2); my $done = 0; my $minrat = 2; $rat = 2; my $ans = 0; while (not($done)) { if (totientIsPermut(@nums)) { if ($rat < $minrat) { $minrat = $rat; $n = lstprod(@nums); if ($n > 10000000) { $done = 1 } else { $ans = lstprod(@nums) } } } @nums = update(@nums) } print "$ans\n"
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Problem 70 - Perl
I hadn't touched Perl except in a very, very brief rushed learning session at the end of the hackathon where I solved the first 20 problems. 50 problems later, I have finally returned to it. And though it is capable and all, boy is it a weird language. My solution to this problem is definitely smarter than a brute force (brute forcing the totient of all numbers below 10^7 would not be fun/fast), but still not as smart as some of the solutions on the Euler problem. My solution works using the fact that the solution must have very few prime factors, but I do an "exhaustive" search over numbers with "few" prime factors, instead of choosing a much nicer, more restrictive set of conditions to search that other people found. Anyway, the solution runs in about 30s, and this is essentially my birthday present to me, today is my birthday, and 70 problems are now done.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment